LA Merfolk: 54% win ratio, 84 points in 52 matches, 8 players.ĭallas Merfolk: 62% win ratio, 149 points in 80 matches, 14 players. It is interesting to note that Tendrils is even more difficult to play than Dredge, but also has many pilots who scrub out of the 5k circuit. Saito and do Anh would beg to disagree with you. Dredge, BTW, didn't win either of those tourneys, it just got into the Top 8.These same numbers suggest that playing Tendrils is a terrible idea. Given the number of people playing the deck it just seems highly improbable that this is a great deck given it's results. Does that sound like the best deck in the format? You have to go down to the 22nd largest Legacy tourney to get another Top 8 appearance. There are 11 tourneys larger than that, most of them recent, with no Dredge in the Top 8. On the other hand shouldn't some of the large field playing Dredge be lucking into a big win here and there, even assuming that the afficionados were few enough that they might be getting suppressed by sheer numbers? The largest Legacy tourney that Dredge has ever Top 8'd in was the 177 person thing in Jupiter in November. Dredge, BTW, didn't win either of those tourneys, it just got into the Top 8. One of those will probably have a far better match record than the other.This is true. That divides the Dredge-playing population into two camps: the people who decided on Dredge over other options because it is a extremely good deck, and the budget players. But the overall match percentage win statistic is practically worthless because Dredge is so cheap to pick up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |